Comparison
PEO vs ASO: Which HR Outsourcing Model Fits?
A PEO co-employs your workforce and brings master health, workers' comp, and tax filings under its FEIN. An ASO administers HR and payroll under your FEIN with no co-employment. The right answer depends on benefits leverage, risk transfer, and how much HR work you want to keep in-house.
The five decision dimensions
- Co-employment. PEO files payroll under its FEIN. ASO files under yours. This affects unemployment ratings, tax credit eligibility, and lender comfort.
- Benefits buying power. PEOs aggregate thousands of employees into master health plans. ASOs let you keep your existing carrier relationships.
- Workers' compensation. PEOs typically include WC under a master policy with pay-as-you-go billing. ASOs leave WC with you.
- Pricing model. PEOs price as PEPM or % of payroll, often bundled. ASOs price per service, à la carte.
- Exit complexity. Leaving a PEO mid-year resets wage bases (FUTA/SUTA/FICA caps) and requires unwinding co-employment. ASO transitions are simpler.
Is a PEO always more expensive than an ASO?
Does ASO mean I keep my own benefits broker?
Which model is better for compliance?
How to decide
Run the comparison with your actual census, your current benefits load, and your workers' comp class codes. The right answer changes as employers grow — many companies start with a PEO for benefits leverage and migrate to ASO + direct carriers when they cross a threshold where master plan economics flip.
When you're ready to compare both side by side, Entravia's How It Works covers a structured intake that supports either model.
Trusted by operators across the PEO ecosystem
Ready when you are
See Entravia handle a real intake.
Walk through a live submission, structured data, and parallel quote distribution — in about 15 minutes.

